Showing posts with label newspaper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label newspaper. Show all posts

Monday, February 1, 2010

First Nations help out Haiti

As events still unfold in Haiti, people around the world are helping on however they can. This past weekend Aboriginal Nations for Haitians was held in Winnipeg, Manitoba. The event featured Aboriginal performers and all money raised ($60,000) is going directly to those most in need, the children. What bothers me is all the negative comments around this event. On the CBC website, some of the readers comments include: "I guess it was a loss, since it cost more to fly the cheifs in", "Why don't they fundraise money for themselves", "maybe you could say this Haitian fundraiser was an attempt by Indian bands to appear more national by giving international aid but". This truly show the feelings that are just below the surface of Canadian society. Please do not net me wrong. I am not saying this is every Canadian who thinks this way, but when people express feelings like this towards one group, it is considered hate. It saddens me to read these comments every time there is a story about First Nations in the paper, even positive stories. Congrats to the organizers in Manitoba

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Welcome to page 9 of the Chronicle Herald

So as a continuation of my blog from September 16 "5 arrested in raid in Preston", my point has once again been proven. Today in the Chronicle Herald, an article ran on the drug raid yesterday in Cole Harbour and Dartmouth. Get this... ON PAGE 9! Please read the previous blog if you are unsure about what I am talking about. I checked the CBC website and found exactly what I expected...nothing. Well, not exactly nothing. There were three comments:
  • Put them in prison for life (11 disagreed)
  • Unspecified(small amount), no weapons, what a waste of officers time and tax payers money (11 agreed)
  • So what? The government is a big drug dealer anyway (18 agreed)
As predicted, CBC did not even run the names of the communities in the headline "12 charged in Halifax-area Drug raids" News flash, none were in Halifax. Last time I checked, Dartmouth and Cole Harbour were part of HRM, but not part of Halifax, nor is Preston, but they ALWAYS make sure that is known.
Amazing, and proves my point. A couple months back when a raid happened in Preston, people were all over this site wanting to get rid of the neighborhood, saying how it was such a horrible community. When I mentioned these raid happen all over the place, not specifically in one community and dared to even mention to check with your neighbors, as they may be dealers (think about it, what a great cover, selling drugs out of a middle class white community, police will never think of looking there), people were all over me. Correct me if I am wrong, but this raid was in Cole Harbour, and those names don't quite seem to fit the names people on this comment site THINK..yes THINK fit the names of people who should be charged in these raids. If you want to see then names, try not to get too tired flipping all the way to page 9, but they are there. Let me tell you, that Cole Harbour is nothing but a slum and crime community...sound familiar?

Monday, July 27, 2009

Opps, they did it again

For a long time now I have been talking about the bias and racist reporting coming form newspapers across the country. Many people look at the paper and just don't see the things myself and many others do. It is so easy to see, and I would like to thank Lynn Barr-Telford from Statistics Canada for calling the Canadian Press to task on such an issue. On July 22, 2009, papers across the country reported on a study recently released. The article was entitled "Native poverty, jail linked" The article goes on to link Native poverty as a result of high incarceration rates. However, according to Stats Canada, "Our analysis did not examine income levels, and the word poverty did not appear in either our news release or in our report" as per Barr-Telford's letter buried on page A7 Opinions section (I would put a link to the letter, but I can not seem to find it on the Chronicle Herald website) Since the word "poverty" was nowhere in the study...OR the press release, why did Sue Bailey of the Canadian Press feel it was her responsibility to embelish the story? Is this what we can expect from the empolyees of the Canadian Press? I do think this has helped prove my point. While I am on it, should the papers also need to print a retraction instead of hiding it on page 7????